Visit the Article Archive
 
Other recent Features
 
MANAGING FOR VALUE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, I
SHARE BUY BACKS, DIVIDENDS AND VALUE DESTRUCTION
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE´S M&A VALUE MINDSET
THE CFO´s VALUE AGENDA
LAME DUCKS, INERTIA AND VALUE DESTRUCTION
PENALTY FOR VALUE UNDERPERFORMANCE
FINALLY GETTING SERIOUS ABOUT VALUE, I
TAKING VALUE PERSONALLY
THE THREE RTSRs
ZERO TOLERANCE FOR VALUE DESTRUCTION
LOOKING FOR VALUE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES
FIRST, STOP THE BLEEDING
DESTROYING E2 (FIVE DELTA SERIES)
DEBUNKING THE DIRECT LABOR COST / VALUE MYTH
THE VALUE RELEGATION ERROR
WHAT WOULD SHAREHOLDERS SAY?
MANAGEMENT´S VALUE AGENDA: SIX PRIORITIES
TONY SOPRANO DOES NOT MAXIMIZE VALUE
VALUE DESTRUCTION FROM THE WRONG CONSULTANTS
WHY THE VALUE BLACK BOX IS NEVER ENOUGH
CONTINUOUS CORPORATE VALUE IMPROVEMENT (CVI)
CHEAP AT TWICE THE PRICE
FIXING THE INCENTIVES VALUE STRUCTURE
 
     
THE HIGH VALUE PRICE OF SHELL-GAME COST CUTS  
 
Published: Tuesday, February 08, 2005
 
As times get tougher and profits more dear, unnecessary staff expenditures stand out like a sore thumb. Growth is slowed and bloated inventories absorb whatever sales are left. Understandably, management´s attention switches to the expense and efficiency (E2) side. Understandable: that´s all that´s left.

Only this time around, only true and enduring cost reforms count. The Street and The City are today wise to bureaucrat shell games such as (1) double-counting expenses previously taken, (2) cutting allocated but presently unfilled phantom positions and (3) contraction by attrition, and the company that tolerates such deliberate deceit merely shoots itself in the foot, value wise.

In all three instances, ‘the number´ is already in the marketplace—that is, already included in the financial community´s perceptions set of future discounted cashflows. Thus by committing one of the three sins above, management accomplishes absolutely nothing in terms of the data upon which market valuations are formed (And you wondered why the announcement of phantom position cuts failed to budge the company´s stock price at all).

Correction. Flailing out with shell game cuts ISN´T entirely without impact. At best, such a ruse means that management´s reputation for straightforward communication is damaged, and future similar announcements are simply ignored. At worst, the financial community ascribes both deception intent and incompetence to incumbent (for now) management.

It is one thing to be caught for double-counting or pretend efficiencies. Something else again to raise suspicions that management doesn´t know the difference between actually dismissing a deadwood manager suppressing company value by 7-9x his total compensation and erasing a hollow box on an organizational chart.

Time to roll in the investor relations pro if management gets caught at the shell game? Not a chance. Mr. Oily´s late arrival on the scene merely confirms that someone, somewhere is trying to ‘manage perceptions´ (read: damage control after management has been caught at cost & value improvement numbers fiction). Old Oily´s hasty appearance merely confirms suspicions among those who help influence the company´s market capitalization, a reflection of value, that something´s up. Where there´s smoke there´s fire, after all.
back

Home Top of Page Quick Contact Company Information
        © Copyright 2006 VBM Consulting. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Website by FLATSPIN WEB SOLUTIONS